Reluctantly, I am interrupting my Indian notebook (which will resume next week) because something else is about to happen. Now, what is it? Oh yes. This Thursday, the paperback edition of my novel Trading Futures is published – a year to the day after its hardback parent. [read more]
Trading Futures
A shit for a main character
Let me break the rules by quoting a negative critique of Trading Futures by someone to whom I was hoping to sell it three years ago: [read more]
Trading futures and the descent of capitalism
Matthew Oxenhay, the protagonist of Trading Futures, couldn’t make sense of it. How had he managed to spend a working life in the City, more or less guessing what would happen to the future prices of commodities, and earn millions of pounds from doing it? And how had he managed to do it while continuing to vote Labour? [read more]
The music that runs through Trading Futures
Sitting at a computer, writing a novel, is quite a monotonous activity. It needs livening up. It would be better if I could listen to music while I wrote. But I don’t like music; I like songs. I like music with words (unless it’s opera). But then I start paying attention to the lyrics, rather than to the words I’m trying to write myself. [read more]
‘Book at Bedtime’: Hearing someone else’s novel
Every evening last week, at 10:45 pm, I was to be found on the sofa at home, listening to Radio 4’s ‘Book at Bedtime’, hearing Trading Futures read back to me by Toby Jones. This was a surreal experience. [read more]
The launch party for Trading Futures
So, anyway, there I was last Thursday evening, several feet up a step ladder, as one is, haranguing a multitude of friends and well-wishers, wondering if this was fantasy or reality, and concluding that it was a mixture of the two. ‘The scene’ – as Matthew Oxenhay might have said, and in fact does say at one point in the novel – ‘was a distillation of life present, of life cumulative to date.’ [Read more]
How I wrote Trading Futures
The problem is that I’m not entirely sure how I wrote it. This is partly a fault of memory, and partly because the novel had no single origin, no notes and no coherent development. [read more]